← Search

Alan Briggs

Hoover, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 12W–12L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Alan Briggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-09-09 · PRC - Pieper/King · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · PRC - Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-13 · PRC - Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donovan Pieper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-22 · PRC - Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Matt Grill / David Thompson
2026-04-15 · PRC - Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donovan Pieper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · PRC - Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · PRC - Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donovan Pieper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-18 · PRC - Pieper · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-11-03 · PRC - Pieper/King · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donovan Pieper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Scott Adams / Michael Gregory
2025-10-27 · PRC - Pieper/King · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-10-06 · PRC - Pieper/King · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-29 · PRC - Pieper/King · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
50%
12W–12L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams