← Search

Trent Ponder

— year-end
42 matches · 31W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Trent Ponder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-19 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Sansing · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with KYLE SAIN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-04 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Sansing · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adam Cohn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · YMCA Mt. Brook - Sansing · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rusty Sansing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · Mtn Brook YMCA - Grill · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rusty Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · BH - Hoerner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rusty Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · Mtn Brook YMCA - Grill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wes Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · BH - Hoerner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-15 · BH - Hoerner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martin Hoerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-02 · Mtn Brook YMCA - Grill · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Perlis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-30 · BH - Hoerner · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rusty Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-17 · YMCA Mtn. Brook - Hoerner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rusty Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-11 · West Homewood - Grill/Hoerner · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Grill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
90%
18W–2L · 63.2% of games
4.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 41.5% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova