← Search

Rachel Olson

— year-end
35 matches · 21W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Rachel Olson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-08-28 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Dye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-21 · Goodrich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-20 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · Goodrich/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-17 · Goodrich/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-11-12 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-07 · Dye/Goodrich/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon McWaters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-10-31 · Dye/Goodrich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blaire Jett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-29 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Grimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-20 · Dye/Goodrich/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams15 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 57.2% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.3% of games
7.5
90%
9W–1L · 63.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Singles
26%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#2 Singles
17%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King