← Search

Juraj Zeman

— year-end
48 matches · 38W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Juraj Zeman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Massimo Bugliosi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Massimo Bugliosi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
Joshua Bergren / Benjamin Smith
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Massimo Bugliosi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Massimo Bugliosi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · Longshore / Hayes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Massimo Bugliosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-23 · Riverstone / Bonacci · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Natalia Zeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · COLLIER/Adult40&over4.0M / Fox · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Stefaniuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · Riverstone / Bonacci · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Natalia Zeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · Longshore / Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Massimo Bugliosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Longshore / Hayes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Massimo Bugliosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Riverstone / Bonacci · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Natalia Zeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · Longshore / Hayes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Massimo Bugliosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams13 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 58.8% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 78.9% of games
8.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams