← Search

Cameron Jacobs

Capitol Heights, MD
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 15W–34L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Cameron Jacobs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Baylor · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lorayne Constant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
Doug Wilson / Thomas Maddux
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Dallas Hoff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-3
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexander Sherwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-17 · BTA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dion Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
L
2026-05-16 · Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shamsu Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-10 · Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Rossi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jesse Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · BTA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kunle Gbadamosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-25 · Jacobs · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richie Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · BTA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Batipps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Rossi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Rossi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
20%
1W–4L · 33.3% of games
3.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 33.8% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.7% of games
2.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#2 Singles
16%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams