← Search

Scott Intner

Annapolis, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 38W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Scott Intner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Estrada/Walsh · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-23 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Russell Maxwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-11 · Estrada/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregory Teal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-07 · Estrada/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sean Helfrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peter Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Estrada/Walsh · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Hofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Ruth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Degreenia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-16 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Russell Maxwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Abels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
61.5%
24W–15L · 55.9% of games
3.5
25%
4W–12L · 41.4% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 59.4% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 60.9% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer