← Search

Jeanna Stecklein

Dayton, OH
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 41W–27L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Jeanna Stecklein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-13 · KTC-Sauer · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-09-08 · QRRC-Hayes · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · KTC-Wait · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Patton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-18 · KTC-Berkhofer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Brinkman-Berkhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Susan Holbrook / Liz Smith
2026-07-12 · KTC-Wait · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Montana Wait
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · KTC-Berkhofer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Brinkman-Berkhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · KTC-Beringer · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rajeev Goel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · QRRC-Mortsolf · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carolyn Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · KTC-Berkhofer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Brinkman-Berkhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · KTC-Berkhofer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Brinkman-Berkhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
Linda Zimmer / Liz Smith
2026-05-31 · KTC-Wait · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Montana Wait
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · KTC-Berkhofer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 60.5% of games
3.0
51.5%
17W–16L · 47.1% of games
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.3% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#2 Singles
12%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer