← Search

Paige Purvis

— year-end
61 matches · 50W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Paige Purvis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Myers, Chad · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Smith Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Walker, Niven · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Roddy Rumbley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · Rumbley, Roddy · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Roddy Rumbley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adam Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Myers, Chad · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Youngblood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randy Tuggle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Myers, Chad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Adam Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · Williamson, Greg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elkin Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-14 · Williamson, Greg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elkin Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-3
L
2026-04-11 · Goforth NC 4.0 Men · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · Goforth NC 4.0 Men · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Landon Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-31 · Williamson, Greg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams21 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
60%
9W–6L · 53.8% of games
4.0
81%
17W–4L · 58.7% of games
7.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 66.4% of games
8.5
100%
5W–0L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer