← Search

Adam Byrd

Brandon, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 98W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Adam Byrd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Myers, Chad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Niven Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-09 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chandler Strain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · Walker, Niven · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Purvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Rumbley, Roddy · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nico Jimeno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-11 · Youngblood, Brad · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Weber Herbison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Myers, Chad · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Purvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · Jackson/Byrd · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma Bond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-8
L
2026-07-15 · Jackson/Byrd · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Byrd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-8
W
2026-07-07 · Byrd, Adam · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-23 · Byrd, Adam · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Dehon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · Byrd, Adam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janice Fulton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-10 · Rumbley, Roddy · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Roddy Rumbley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 65.4% of games
3.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 71.4% of games
3.5
90%
27W–3L · 66.8% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.7% of games
6.5
80%
8W–2L · 61.9% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 69.4% of games
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 73.4% of games
3.5mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.7% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 70.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
17 matches
#1 Singles
12%
14 matches
#2 Singles
11%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova