← Search

Katie Newell

— year-end
36 matches · 29W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Katie Newell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-08-24 · VCC - Smith · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Maggie Klyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-20 · VCC - Jones · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rosemary Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · VCC - Smith · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsay Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-11 · VCC - Smith · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Michelle Johnson / Amber Terakedis
2026-08-10 · VCC - Smith · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Maggie Klyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · VCC - Smith/Neese · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Kirkpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · VCC - Jones · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rosemary Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · VCC - Smith/Neese · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary-Michael Neese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · VCC - Smith/Neese · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brittany Stegall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · VCC - Jones · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rosemary Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · VCC - Smith/Neese · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Diane Early
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · VCC - Smith/Neese · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Angela Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Teams14 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 58.9% of games
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 64.1% of games
5.5
100%
11W–0L · 62.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#1 Singles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova