← Search

Chaitawat Sirisereewan

Apex, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 44W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Chaitawat Sirisereewan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
2026-08-30 · TOC.Li · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tianren Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-28 · TOC.Sachan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Youngjun Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · TOC.Li · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tianren Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Sachan · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Abhimanyu Joshi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · TOC.Li · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tianren Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-13 · TOC.Li · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hengning Cao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Tyson Brown / David Jackson
2026-08-09 · TOC.Li · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tianren Zhou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · TOC.Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Tse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · TOC.Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leon LI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · TOC.Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leon LI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · TOC.Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leon LI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Rajiv Nair
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
94.7%
18W–1L · 74.9% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 51% of games
6.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 63.9% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 68.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova