← Search

Eric Bostic

Apex, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 33W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Eric Bostic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-08-06 · TOC.Hofberg · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · MD.Bostic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Chuang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · MD.Bostic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Fearrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · TOC.Hofberg · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-02 · MD.Bostic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Chuang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-26 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Stanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elton TSAI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · MD.Bostic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elliot Orlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · MD.Bostic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elliot Orlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
Matthew Stewart
2026-05-28 · TOC.Hofberg · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-21 · MD.Bostic · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grayson Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-18 · TOC.Hofberg · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 54% of games
3.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–10L · 28% of games
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.1% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King