← Search

Stephanie Teague

— year-end
41 matches · 29W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Teague to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Judith Boen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Laurel Schley / Elizabeth Arens
2026-09-01 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maggie Scanlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Madigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · Arens/Bentonville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Kinnamon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · Arens/Bentonville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nikolas Simpson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · Arens/Bentonville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Gaines mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · Arens/Bentonville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Kinnamon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · Teague/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Catherine Womack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-24 · Moore/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grace Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · Moore/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacqueline Shearman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · Moore/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kati Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-01 · Moore/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mariko Paschall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 64.3% of games
4.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 54.5% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.4% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.3% of games
4.5mixed
80%
8W–2L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#2 Singles
12%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova