← Search

Jazmin Taylor

Rogers, AR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 19W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jazmin Taylor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Purkey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-8
L
2026-06-30 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison van Matre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shailyn Abbott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thea Fernstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-28 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thea Fernstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thea Fernstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thea Fernstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-15 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Saffran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-14 · Fernstrom/Rogers/IND · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lacey Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-06 · Fernstrom/Rogers/IND · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jill Whatley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-04 · Fernstrom/Rogers/IND · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thea Fernstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · Fernstrom/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison van Matre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 54.9% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.1% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal