← Search

Jennifer Love

Mechanicsville, VA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 14W–25L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Love to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Megan Jernigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brooke van Zandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melissa Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Melissa Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · Burkwood-Sweeney - A Sweeney · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kandy Baserap
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · Burkwood 6.0 Brock~Mohs · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Powell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-09 · Burkwood 6.0 Brock~Mohs · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Hylton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Burkwood-Sweeney - A Sweeney · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Libby Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-20 · Burkwood-Sweeney - A Sweeney · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Libby Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Burkwood 6.0 Brock~Mohs · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Powell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Burkwood-Hazelgrove · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · Burkwood~Brock · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.7% of games
3.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 33.9% of games
5.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.9% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 32.8% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.1% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe