← Search

Tim Nahuel Schulz

— year-end
14 matches · 9W–5L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tim Nahuel Schulz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Who Is We? Flipper Grillers · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-3
W
2026-06-21 · Who Is We? Flipper Grillers · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-3
W
2026-05-17 · Team 4 Who Is We? Next Gen · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-0
L
2026-05-09 · Team 4 Who Is We? Next Gen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rodney Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-09 · Cracked Racquets 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Orlando Delgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-12 · Team 2 Who Is We? Evolution · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-04 · Cracked Racquets 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Orlando Delgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-09-28 · Cracked Racquets 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Orlando Delgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-08-09 · Tri-Level Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-03 · Tri-Level Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chandler Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-3
L
2025-07-19 · Tri-Level Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-05-17 · Team 4 4.0NV Who Is We? Evolution · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 61.5% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.8% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
6 matches
#2 Singles
21%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#3 Singles
14%
2 matches
#1 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer