Jackson Schwanebeck
Lincoln, NE
39 matches · 34W–5L · seasons 2025–2026
Captains: add Jackson Schwanebeck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history39 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Jackson Figard / John Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Erik Johnson / Nancy Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
Jorge Cardenas / John Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
9W–0L · 73.8% of games
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.7% of games
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.9% of games
4.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 61.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.