← Search

Jason Dean

Lincoln, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 73W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Dean to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Dean Green · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackson Schwanebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · NE/GreenDean/18&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samuel Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · NE/GreenDean/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kreg Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · NE/GreenDean/18&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackson Schwanebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · Dean · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ty Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Dean · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · Dean · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jae Sung Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · Dean · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-29 · Dean · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Kingery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-03-22 · Dean · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trieu Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-15 · Dean · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Kingery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · Kingery · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 55.4% of games
3.5
86.2%
25W–4L · 65% of games
4.0
52.8%
38W–34L · 52.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams