← Search

Shaun Stacey

— year-end
40 matches · 23W–17L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Shaun Stacey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Patterson/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matthew Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Cockrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-18 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hattie Kurin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Shelton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
Sarah White / Mark Popejoy
2026-06-30 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Bright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Smith-Cockrell/Rogers/MRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Cockrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hattie Kurin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · Smith/Rogers/MRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Gottbrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Blake Jones
2026-05-09 · Smith/Rogers/MRC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Cockrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-01 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · Cockrell/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Hawron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 56.3% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 36.4% of games
6.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 66% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#3 Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe