← Search

Holly Gogel

Saint Louis, MO
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
16 matches · 10W–6L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Holly Gogel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-06-30 · Mrazek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Mrazek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Mrazek · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-15 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-5
W
2026-04-07 · STL/Kennedy-Churchill/18&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan J Zilch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-09 · STL/Kennedy-Churchill/18&Over3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie McAvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-23 · STL/Kennedy-Churchill/18&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Churchill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-18 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelli McKie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-12 · STL/Kennedy-Churchill/18&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan J Zilch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-11 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-02 · STL/Kennedy-Churchill/18&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Dembiec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-21 · Mrazek/McKie (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#2 Singles
25%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert