← Search

Sandra Pietroburgo

— year-end
165 matches · 55W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandra Pietroburgo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
2026-04-22 · Kretschmer /Augsburger (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Chiarolanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Ebert Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-08 · Kretschmer /Augsburger (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Burwitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Schwaegel (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth E Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-25 · Kretschmer /Augsburger (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Tepen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-11 · Kretschmer /Augsburger (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Ebert Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-22 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth E Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-18 · Kretschmer /Augsburger (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-15 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martina Augsburger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-02-11 · Kretschmer /Augsburger (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martina Augsburger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-28 · Kretschmer /Augsburger (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
34.4%
55W–105L · 43% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal