← Search

Beth Stagner

Raleigh, NC
2.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
33 matches · 27W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Beth Stagner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-09-01 · La.Daigle40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jessica Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Kelsey Brandt / Molly Lewis
2026-08-30 · Cl.Owens18C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Faust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · Me.Frost18C · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Robin Wascher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-23 · Cl.Owens18C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Faust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-21 · Me.Frost18C · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kenzie Demetros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · Me.Frost18C · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katie Fielitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Robin Wascher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Cl.Owens18C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Claire Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · Me.Frost18C · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melanie Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Cl.Owens18C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Faust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · Je.Jones18S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-27 · Ch.Burr18T3.5 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Robin Wascher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 73.1% of games
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.5% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 67% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#3 Singles
6%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams