← Search

Michelle Eisenberg

— year-end
54 matches · 33W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Michelle Eisenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
Jessica Jones / Beth Stagner
2026-09-01 · He.Caracio40C · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lee Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · Sh.Clarkson18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Canavan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · Sh.Clarkson18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Canavan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · Je.Wolborsky40S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · Pa.Spell40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Eisenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Je.Wolborsky40S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · Je.Wolborsky40S · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Pa.Spell40M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Eisenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-04 · Pa.Spell40M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Eisenberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-28 · Sh.Clarkson40A · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · Ca.Werder55A3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Werder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-13 · Ta.Backus18A · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
70%
7W–3L · 57.6% of games
3.0
50%
9W–9L · 51.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 67.2% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova