← Search

Emily Eggebrecht

Nashville, TN
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 4W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emily Eggebrecht to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Osborne · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jillian Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Osborne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitsuyo Suzuki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · Osborne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jess Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Hamrick/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-20 · Hamrick/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Gilbertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-04-06 · Hamrick/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-30 · Hamrick/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Emley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-23 · Hamrick/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Nealy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-02 · Hamrick/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-17 · Hamrick/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Shaub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-03 · Hamrick/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Nealy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-27 · Hamrick/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 37.5% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#1 Singles
29%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal