← Search

Decker Rolph

Boise, ID
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
25 matches · 18W–7L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Decker Rolph to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Albert Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Rosellini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Magnuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · MSA 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Staley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-27 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shane Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · MSA 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Staley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · MSA 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Salerno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-18 · MSA 18+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-14 · MSA 40+ (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Pugsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-11 · Basta · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Henson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 58.3% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
4 matches
#2 Singles
8%
2 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova