← Search

Allie Hughes

Findlay, OH
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
19 matches · 17W–2L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Allie Hughes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-07-29 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Degen PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vera Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
Josie Kimaid / Sara Shelton
2026-07-08 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Degen PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alyssa Emch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-26 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Degen PTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Degen PTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Degen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Kristen Semer
2026-05-27 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Degen PTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · with Kendra Spears championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · NWO Tri Level Women McKee-Findlay · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Klink
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-4
W
Danielle Halligan / Christie Heinlen
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · with Kendra Spears championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · NWO Tri Level Women McKee-Findlay · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jody Schaefer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-02-15 · NWO Tri Level Women McKee-Findlay · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · NWO Tri Level Women McKee-Findlay · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bohnlein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-04 · NWO Tri Level Women McKee-Findlay · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Bohnlein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 70.7% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 65.2% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 75.6% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#2 Singles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer