← Search

Elena Haviland

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 75W–32L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elena Haviland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-06-09 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · LIB-Slade 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-05-12 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruedee Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · with Christie Dickinson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · with Christina Slade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Cindy Martin / Katelyn Marando
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · with Christina Slade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · CHIP-Levasseur 40 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #3 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-3
W
2026-02-07 · CHIP-Levasseur 40 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #3 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-2
L
2026-02-01 · CHIP-Levasseur 40 WOMEN winter SINGLES F · #2 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-07 · 1LIB-Sauld 75 WOMEN COMBO F3 · #2 Doubles · with Laura LeVasseur
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.1% of games
3.5
81.2%
39W–9L · 63.3% of games
4.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 55.5% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
12 matches
#2 Singles
10%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal