← Search

Alexis Capezza

Mamaroneck, NY
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
22 matches · 16W–6L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Alexis Capezza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Randa Sauerborn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Randa Sauerborn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Randa Sauerborn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Patricia Meyers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Patricia Meyers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Rebecca Dickson / Jennifer Shim
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · with Patricia Meyers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · with Patricia Meyers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · Southern: TIA 3.5 Sauerborn 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randa Sauerborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · Southern: TIA 3.5 Sauerborn 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randa Sauerborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · Southern: TIA 3.5 Sauerborn 18+ 3.5 Day · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randa Sauerborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-11 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 70.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
1 match
#3 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe