← Search

Justinne Lake-jedzinak

— year-end
37 matches · 24W–13L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Justinne Lake-jedzinak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-07-28 · #4 Doubles · with Lori Sarnelli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · Point Set, Sarnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Sarnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · Sasaki/Lake-Jedzinak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Giselle Leon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Lynbrook, Avvinti/Foley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malissa Oneill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-01 · Lynbrook, Avvinti/Foley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Cimetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · Sasaki/Lake-Jedzinak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bianca Isabela Catoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · Sasaki/Lake-Jedzinak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Sasaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Lynbrook, Avvinti/Foley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Appel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · Point Set, Sarnelli · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Sarnelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · Lynbrook, Avvinti/Foley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malissa Oneill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · with Rudolf van Mol championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7
W
2026-05-26 · Wu · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams11 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.1% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova