← Search

Elizabeth Gormley

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 89W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Gormley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
Neerja Bhatnagar / Carol Ryan
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Pam Widener championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Elizabeth Anderson / Nancy DAmato
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · with Ling Zhang championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Gould/Aney · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Widener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · Gould/Aney · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Shube
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-13 · Gould/Aney · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Widener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · Gould/Welles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Gould
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · Gould/Welles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Bonaviso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · Gould/Welles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Bonaviso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · Gould/Welles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ling Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · Metro: Gould/Welles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Gould
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-02-11 · Metro: Gould/Welles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Therese Stowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-10-15 · Gould · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace de Fries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games
3.5
65.4%
53W–28L · 55.6% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 63.5% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 67.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe