← Search

Anna Hallmark

Charlotte, NC
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
10 matches · 7W–3L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Anna Hallmark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
W
Micahla Funderburk / Sarah Anderson
2026-09-02 · MLong/SFarley (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Madison Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-31 · MLong/SFarley (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maggie Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-04 · MLong (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · MLong (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-20 · MLong (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-13 · MLong (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-06 · MLong (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Witherspoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · MLong (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-23 · MLong (Queens) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-09 · MLong (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Sigmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 61.7% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
2 matches
#2 Singles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova