← Search

Cliff Wade

Dallas, TX
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
10 matches · 8W–2L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Cliff Wade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Team 4 Jeff Gulbas 6.5M · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Milhizer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kendarius Talton / Rafael Fields
2026-08-22 · Team 4 Jeff Gulbas 6.5M · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Gulbas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-21 · Team 4 Jeff Gulbas 6.5M · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Sinatra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-28 · Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Epker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Epker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Epker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-24 · Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Flynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Flynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Collin Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.2% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova