← Search

James Bowling

Dallas, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 24W–17L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add James Bowling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Goodhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alan Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-13 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Grist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Sexton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Goodhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-15 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Zach Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-11 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Tolley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-02-21 · DAC/Tolley M3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Tolley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
54.5%
18W–15L · 52.2% of games
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
9 matches
#1 Singles
20%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#2 Singles
12%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams