← Search

William Kamenoff

Annapolis, MD
3.0A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
75 matches · 53W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add William Kamenoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Briscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-15 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Briscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Briscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Briscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Estrada/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Estrada/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Ravekes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Douglass Lamartin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
William Bell / Bryant Centofanti
2024-08-21 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with George Briscoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Nicole Mehmedovich / Kunle Gbadamosi
2024-08-20 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Coyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
Thomas Schlossberg / George Briscoe
2024-08-17 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Duplechain championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-08-17 · #1 Doubles · with William Ravekes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 69.1% of games
3.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.1% of games
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 58.1% of games
6.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 65.4% of games
7.0
62.2%
23W–14L · 55.3% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe