← Search

William Ravekes

Severna Park, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 123W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add William Ravekes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Ravekes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-09-11 · Walsh/Wofford · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Wofford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-30 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Coyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-26 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Ravekes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-25 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Coyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-14 · Walsh/Wofford · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Victoria Ehly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-13 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dave Degreenia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Estrada/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Kamenoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · Estrada/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregory Teal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · Estrada/Walsh · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · Estrada/Walsh · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · Walsh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Fichtner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
69.7%
46W–20L · 57.7% of games
3.5
6.2%
1W–15L · 35.6% of games
6.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 57.1% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 46.2% of games
3.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.3% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
85.7%
30W–5L · 69.4% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#2 Singles
10%
22 matches
#1 Singles
10%
20 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer