← Search

James Burda

GLASTONBURY, CT
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 59W–19L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add James Burda to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-06-20 · RFL:5.0:Burda/Salak · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrew Salak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · RFL:5.0:Burda/Salak · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Carlos Salmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-2
L
2026-03-21 · RFL:5.0:Burda/Salak · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brian Boyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 4-3
W
2026-03-14 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-07 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-21 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trevor Glasgow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 7-6
L
2026-01-24 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-10 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Romaine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-12-05 · RFL:Condit/ · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christie Albera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-23 · RFL:Condit/ · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christie Albera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
82.9%
34W–7L · 62% of games
5.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.7% of games
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.5% of games
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#1 Singles
14%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer