← Search

Pamela Jeppson

Bloomfield, CT
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
245 matches · 185W–60L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Pamela Jeppson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history245 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Carlos Landron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Abby Decker
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Bipasha Mehn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Reilly O'Brien mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Ramon Rodriguez Meza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Chance Fechtor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Thomas Lomenzo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Matti Teittinen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Thomas Lomenzo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams93 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.6% of games
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.7% of games
4.5
63%
29W–17L · 53.5% of games
5.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 48.7% of games
10.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 69.1% of games
8.0mixed
93.9%
31W–2L · 67.7% of games
9.0mixed
81.4%
35W–8L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
54 matches
#1 Singles
20%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
25 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King