← Search

Susan Courtney

— year-end
40 matches · 23W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Susan Courtney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-06-29 · LCTA65/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Goheen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-18 · LCTA65/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · LCTA65/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leonie Leventhal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-13 · LCTA55/McLean/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Stadelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-04 · LCTA55/McLean/Seabrook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Susan Hardy / Rebecca Woods
2026-02-18 · LCTA55/McLean/Seabrook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Ewald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-23 · LCTA55/McLean/Seabrook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Ewald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Tracy Cross / Meg Boyles
2025-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Stadelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cinda Althoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Anne Schmidt / Beverly Mckinley
2025-11-03 · LCTA65/Smith/Seabrook · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Dalpee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Ewald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-23 · LCTA65/Smith/Seabrook · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Dalpee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.8%
21W–13L · 53.2% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer