← Search

Kathryn Rigney

— year-end
50 matches · 30W–20L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kathryn Rigney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-06-21 · Team 1 The Roland Girlos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mary Ann Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-2
W
2026-06-07 · Team 1 The Roland Girlos · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yulia Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-4
L
2026-06-04 · Team 1 The Roland Girlos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Wallenhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-1
W
2026-05-08 · Team 2 Spring Chicks · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · Team 2 Spring Chicks · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · Team 2 Spring Chicks · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-07 · Carr - GPS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Collier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
L
2026-01-05 · Carr - GPS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-07 · #4 Doubles · with Mary Ann Wagner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-06 · #3 Doubles · with Mary Ann Wagner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-03-15 · GPS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Collier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-02-22 · GPS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelley Cantrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-2
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 52.1% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 56% of games
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams