← Search

Brett Brading

SIMPSONVILLE, SC
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 15W–2L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Brett Brading to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-07-05 · UPTA18M/Beckerle/HollyTree · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Hudgens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-1
W
2026-06-07 · UPTA18M/Beckerle/HollyTree · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danielle Beckerle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-08 · UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTree · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Keel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Keel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · UPTA18A/Hart/HollyTree · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Keel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-09-20 · UPTA18C/Keel/Holly Tree · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-09-09 · UPTA18C/Keel/Holly Tree · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Schmeissing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-08-30 · UPTA18C/Keel/Holly Tree · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Bartlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-08-09 · UPTA18C/Keel/Holly Tree · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-07-13 · UPTA18M/Bieber/HollyTree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Bieber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-06 · UPTA18M/Bieber/HollyTree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Sykes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
Harvinder Sidhu / Lauren Smith
2025-06-29 · UPTA18M/Bieber/HollyTree · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Waltz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
100%
4W–0L · 59.8% of games
4.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.2% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams