← Search

Eric Kendall

Lakeville, MA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 38W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Kendall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Brandon Bale championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · SSY:SSYMCA:Prudente · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Callanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Garland Kimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · SSY:SSYMCA:Prudente · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Naftoly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · SSY:SSYMCA:Prudente · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Naftoly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Garland Kimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-14 · SSY:SSYMCA:Prudente · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Callanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xavier ELBAZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-08 · LK: Pieper/Sanders · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Xavier ELBAZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-06-28 · LAK:Lakeville:Milstein · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Garland Kimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-06-28 · LAK:Lakeville:Milstein · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Garland Kimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-14 · LAK:Lakeville:Milstein · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 55.7% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.2% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.2% of games
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert