← Search

Molly Clipp

— year-end
291 matches · 207W–84L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Molly Clipp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history291 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Woodard-Feldmann (F) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Kellogg/Grassle · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Mazzier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Dubberke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-11 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Shiras-Cody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-28 · Kellogg/Grassle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Grassle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-6, 5-6
W
2026-05-03 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-19 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Daigle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-11 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Woodard/Feldman (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
72.7%
192W–72L · 59.9% of games
8.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.4% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 60% of the time
#1 Singles
60%
173 matches
#2 Singles
21%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
4%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert