← Search

Christine Kahm

CHARLOTTE, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 22W–12L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Christine Kahm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-08-25 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meaghan Ahern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-23 · LAMO-Morris/NMP · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amber Brannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · DWest/CWincek (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Chillag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Diana West championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Christina Zadell / Kathy Lynch
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Madison Lohnes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Carolyn Gustavson / Meredith Cramer
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · with Lina Clarke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · #2 Doubles · with Hannah Chillag championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-14 · LAMOR-AMORRIS/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Meiners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · LAMOR-AMORRIS/NMP · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Chillag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-06 · DWest/DCato (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Gay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · CKahm/AHitchins (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lina Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-15 · DWest/DCato (Charlotte Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Gay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 63.8% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.6% of games
9.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova