← Search

Elizabeth Diller

Henrico, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 87W–58L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Diller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
W
2026-09-05 · Westwood Seredni · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Zach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-23 · Westwood Weekenders - Hause · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-22 · Westwood Seredni · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristy Seredni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-16 · Westwood Weekenders - Hause · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · Westwood Seredni · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Hupe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Crotty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · 11 Westwood 40 love - hause · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liza Hause
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · 11 Westwood 40 love - hause · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liza Hause
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Crotty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Crotty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Hupe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 67.2% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 55.7% of games
4.0
54.9%
28W–23L · 53% of games
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 63.4% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 60.5% of games
7.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.3% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.4% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Female Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams