← Search

Kathleen Crotty

— year-end
88 matches · 58W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Crotty to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Herm Orski-Lines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Charles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · Herm Orski-Lines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · Hermitage Berens Trilevel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-28 · 7 Hermitage Lines Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kandace McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-5
L
2026-07-26 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yancey Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yancey Haas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Diller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Gabriela Ghita championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · Hermitage Shriner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Niell Jacobsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-28 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Diller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Diller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · Willow Oaks HAAS 2026 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Dollar Shriner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 58% of games
4.0
71.7%
33W–13L · 59.2% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.3% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert