← Search

Jacqui Jensen

Kansas City, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 98W–131L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jacqui Jensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
L
2026-09-13 · True, Maki · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Pflanz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · True, Maki · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-3
L
2026-06-01 · True, Maki · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-11 · True, Maki · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-04 · True, Maki · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-29 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-26 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deann Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Loras Heck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Rexroat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-13 · True, Maki · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-04 · Jensen, Jacqui · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Bazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-29 · True, Maki · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
66.2%
47W–24L · 56.8% of games
4.0
32.1%
45W–95L · 42.1% of games
7.0
50%
6W–6L · 52.2% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
42 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal