← Search

Colti Callagy

Kansas City, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 93W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Colti Callagy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · Gerleman, Garrett · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Tobias mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-12 · Gerleman, Garrett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Zachary Carroll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · Gerleman, Garrett · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Tobias mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-20 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tennille Adkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · Sandefur, Mary · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Ascencio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-13 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · Sandefur, Mary · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · Sandefur, Mary · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sylvia Fendler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sylvia Fendler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
50%
4W–4L · 54.2% of games
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 49% of games
4.0
59.8%
61W–41L · 53.9% of games
4.5
37%
10W–17L · 46.9% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#1 Singles
11%
18 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer