← Search

Dirk McDermott

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 150W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dirk McDermott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history227 matches
W
Mark Hartman / David van Thuyne
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Hervey Pierre championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Will Ricketts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Bob Sullivan / Rockwell Pearson
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with David Longcope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sasha Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
Andrew Baker / Scott Bice
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with John Feldman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · SS-LGT GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendall Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · GTC GOLD · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cydney Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
Ned Rollhaus / Richard Wright
2026-07-01 · SS-LGT GOLD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · GTC GOLD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · SS-LGT GOLD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Jaszewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · GTC GOLD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
73.7%
56W–20L · 59.9% of games
8.0
70.6%
24W–10L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
22W–11L · 54.9% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.8% of games
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
69 matches
#1 Singles
25%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe