← Search

Sasha Parker

Aurora, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 60W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sasha Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-08-11 · CACM RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · CACM NAVY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dirk McDermott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-04 · CACM RED · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Gavin Collyott / Mikennah Schwing
2026-08-02 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mustafa Neemuchwala mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-21 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katie Frisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Rebecca Newby / Ross Hoffman
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · with John Blue championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-17 · #3 Doubles · with John Blue championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Justin Tilley / Sara Hemmer
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · with Brian Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · with John Blue championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-19 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
71.1%
32W–13L · 59.8% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 68.3% of games
7.5mixed
90%
9W–1L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.6% of games
8.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
40 matches
#1 Singles
25%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova