← Search

Julia Dreyfoos

— year-end
28 matches · 8W–20L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Julia Dreyfoos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-09-12 · CP-Czerwinski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Greenlaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-24 · CP-Nicely Played-Darrow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-09 · CP-Nicely Played-Darrow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-29 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ethel Brende
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-01 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ethel Brende
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-01-19 · CP-Lucky Charms-Darrow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Laursen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2024-10-27 · CP-Czerwinski 7.0 Women’s 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-09-21 · CP-Czerwinski 7.0 Women’s 55+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Garnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2023-05-01 · CP-Zens · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Fretwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2023-01-29 · CP-Bouton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Buckingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-02-12 · CP-Garnett · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stanford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-01-29 · CP-Garnett · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carla Stanford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams10 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
30%
3W–7L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer